Now that LP National has disaffiliated New Hampshire’s long-standing Libertarian Party, the state’s libertarian movement has fractured into two competing factions — each claiming to be the true heir to the “Live Free or Die” tradition, the NH motto attributed to General John Stark. What began as an internal dispute over messaging and bylaws has escalated into a full‑blown political civil war, with national implications for the Libertarian Party. This article seeks to give an overview of this situation and a comparison of the two groups currently competing for affiliation status with the National Libertarian Party. One group is headed by Blackfyre, the other by Strong, and together they now play A Game of Bylaws.

The Old State Order: LPNH – Libertarian Party of New Hampshire (1.0) 

To understand how New Hampshire reached this point, we need to look at the original LPNH — the organization whose collapse set the stage for today’s conflict. 

  • Backstory:

Founded in the 1970s, LPNH lost ballot access in 2018 after failing to reach the 4% threshold in the gubernatorial race. The party struggled to regain footing, even receiving reduced petition requirements during COVID‑19 emergency orders.

By the early 2020s, the LP Mises Caucus — a more conservative, paleolibertarian faction aligned with Ron Paul — took control of LPNH. This mirrored the broader right‑leaning shift within the national Libertarian Party following the Mises Caucus’s 2022 victory. Under Mises leadership, the national LP removed planks supporting abortion rights and condemning bigotry, and invited Donald Trump to speak at the 2024 national convention. At the LNC convention, Trump promised to free Ross Ulbricht and turn the US into the Bitcoin capital of the world, thereby earning many libertarian votes for the 2024 election he went on to win.

LPNH moved even further rightward than the national party, becoming a vanguard of edgy, confrontational messaging aimed at shifting the Overton Window. Posts on X included statements such as “January 6th didn’t go far enough,” a variation of the “Fourteen Words” with “libertarian” substituted for “white,” and (now deleted) commentary on MLK Jr. Day suggesting black Americans “owe the US” due to federal racial policies giving them preferential treatment. The party openly stated its intent to alienate leftists and drive them out of New Hampshire — a strategy that arguably helped sow the seeds of a left‑libertarian counter‑movement.

The New Contenders 

With the old LPNH disaffiliated, two rival groups have emerged, each claiming to be the rightful successor. Only one can be the official LP National affiliate.

1.) The Granite State Libertarian Party (aka Granite State Libertarians)

The GSLP formally adopted bylaws and elected leadership on August 30, 2026, though an account claiming to be affiliated with the GSLP had publicly pledged to replace LPNH months earlier, in March 2026

  • Leadership 
  • Differentiating Characteristics
    • Left-leaning
    • Hostile to disaffiliated LPNH
    • Anti-Bigotry Plank
      • GSLP “reject[s] bigotry as irrational and repugnant to the values of liberty and individualism” 
    • Increased Gatekeeping
      • Intended to prevent another takeover from outsiders (such as happened with the Mises Caucus)
        • Wants its members to prove their dedication to the Libertarian Party before they have any control over its direction
      • Requires new members to spend at least a year as “Pledge Members” before gaining “Activist” status within GSLP
      • Must maintain “Activist” status for an additional year before becoming eligible for “Sustaining” status
        • “Sustaining” status required for full convention voting rights 
    • Focus on candidate development over social media engagement
      • Has expressed intent to focus more on running LP candidates than generating social media attention

2.) The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire (2.0)

The second contender is a newly formed organization led by Matthew Strong and Dennis Pratt, which submitted its affiliation application to the national LP on August 20, 2026

  • Leadership

Why This Civil War Matters

New Hampshire’s libertarians wield outsized influence due to the Free State Project and the state’s unique political culture. Internal fractures affect ballot access, candidate recruitment, messaging, and the future of libertarian politics in the region.

Only one faction can become the official LP affiliate. Whether the national party recognizes the GSLP, the Strong‑Pratt LPNH, or neither, the libertarian movement in New Hampshire is entering a period of intense competition. In the end, these factions aren’t just fighting over bylaws — they’re fighting over identity, ideology, and the future of liberty in the Granite State. One affiliate choice will result in a two-year freeze on New Hampshire Libertarian leadership, while the other will import a board with family and faction continuity to the entity just expelled. Ideology aside, those are different bets about whether New Hampshire’s problem was personnel or rules.

Whether this civil war produces a stronger movement or a lasting fracture remains to be seen. For voters seeking an alternative to the GOP and Democrats, the next year will reveal which faction can build a credible political organization — and which will fade into the long history of libertarian schisms.

Charts (ain’t nobody got time to read!)

Timeline Overview

DateTitleDescription
1974–2017LPNH RisesThe Libertarian Party of New Hampshire grows from its founding roots, building decades of activism and identity in the Granite State.
2018The Loss of Ballot AccessLPNH fails to reach 4 % in the gubernatorial race, losing official ballot status and weakening its institutional standing.
2020–2023The Mises AscendancyA paleolibertarian wave reshapes LPNH and the national LP.
2024–2025The Shadow YearsEdgy messaging, internal revolt, and ideological fracture.
March 2026The Reformist OathThe Granite State Libertarians vow to replace LPNH.
May 25, 2026The Disaffiliation DecreeLP National severs ties with LPNH (1.0).
July 2, 2026The Appeal of the Old GuardLPNH petitions the Judicial Committee to overturn disaffiliation.
August 17, 2026The Final JudgmentThe Judicial Committee unanimously upholds disaffiliation.
August 20, 2026The Rise of LPNH (2.0)Strong and Pratt submit their claim to the throne.
August 30, 2026The GSLP ConclaveBlackfyre’s faction adopts bylaws and elects its council.
September 2026The War for RecognitionTwo factions. One affiliation. The battle begins.

Leadership & Structure

CategoryGranite State Libertarian Party (GSLP)Libertarian Party of New Hampshire (2.0)
ChairRachel “Blackfyre” DannerMatthew Strong
Vice ChairConrad NelsonDennis Pratt
SecretaryRich TomassoSean Dempsey
TreasurerStephen VilleeBrent Tweed
Additional LeadershipMembership Director: Angela RyanBoard Members: Goldsmith, Iacoboni, Bloodworth, M. Bloodworth, Sussman, Nass, German, Bermain, Binder
Founding ContextFormed after internal reform attempts failed within LPNHFormed immediately after LPNH disaffiliation; submitted affiliation application Aug. 20, 2026
Internet Presencex.com/GSLibertarian, graniteliberty.comNo unified site as of publication date; leaders active on X

Ideology & Messaging

CategoryGSLPLPNH (2.0)
General IdeologyLeft‑leaning libertarianRight‑leaning libertarian
View of Disaffiliated LPNHStrongly hostile; sees LPNH 1.0 as toxicIdeologically adjacent; shares some personnel ties
Anti‑Bigotry PlankExplicitly rejects bigotry as “irrational and repugnant”No anti‑bigotry plank; supports freedom of association even if racially based
Social Media StrategyFocus on candidates, not edgy postsMixed; less edgy than LPNH 1.0 but ideologically similar
Gatekeeping PhilosophyStrong gatekeeping to prevent hostile takeoversNo gatekeeping; open membership
Cultural AlignmentClassical liberal, reformist, anti‑MisesFree State‑aligned, Mises‑adjacent

Membership Rules

CategoryGSLPLPNH (2.0)
Membership TiersYes — Pledge → Activist → SustainingNone
Voting RightsOnly “Sustaining” members (after ~2 years)Immediate voting rights upon joining
RequirementsTime‑based progression; commitment to anti‑bigotry plankNH residency/intent, dues, non‑aggression pledge, no other party membership
Purpose of StructurePrevent future takeovers like the Mises CaucusEncourage rapid growth and participation

Key Figures & Allies

CategoryGSLPLPNH (2.0)
Notable AlliesJustin O’Donnell, Arthur Ketchen, Richard Manzo, Caleb DyerRachel Goldsmith, Ryan & Masha Bloodworth, Stephen Nass, Patrick Binder
Historical TiesReformist wing of old LPNHMany members previously involved with LPNH 1.0
Factional RootsReaction to Mises takeoverContinuation of right‑leaning libertarian activism

Strategic Priorities

CategoryGSLPLPNH (2.0)
Primary FocusCandidate development, party professionalismRapid rebuilding, ideological continuity
Approach to LP NationalSeeks recognition as a clean break from LPNH 1.0Seeks recognition as the legitimate successor organization
Long‑Term VisionRebuild LP NH with safeguards against extremismRestore LPNH brand with open membership and Free State energy

I’m Vincent

Welcome to Shire Free Media, where journalistic integrity and conspiracy research get together for a great time!

Let’s connect